About the Author
Steve Janke has been blog­ging since 2004, pa­tiently build­ing An­gry in the Great White North in­to one of Ca­na­da's fore­most polit­ic­al blogs. An­gry in the Great White North is re­quired read­ing for con­ser­vat­ive Ca­na­dians, but Steve wants every­one to feel wel­come to drop by and of­fer up com­ments and o­pin­ions, re­gard­less of their pol­i­tics. Steve's blog­ging ef­forts were re­cog­nized in 2008 when he was a­ward­ed sec­ond place in the Best Con­serv­a­tive Blog cat­e­go­ry in the Ca­na­dian Blog A­wards.
Contact
Share your thoughts and o­pin­ions by leav­ing com­ments on the blog. Of course, some things are best not shared on a pub­lic blog post­ing; for things like that, con­tact him by email. He's al­ways on the look­out for sto­ry i­de­as and hot tips.
Logo
Mobile Blog
http://m.stevejanke.com
Get Angry in the Great White North
on your mobile phone!
Point your phone's browser at
m.stevejanke.com

Category: CanWest

Why is the CRTC abandoning the fee-for-carriage problem to market forces? (Maybe I should just shut up and be happy)

A while back, there was a remarkable story about how the chairman of the CRTC, Konrad von Finckenstein, told broadcasters CTV and Canwest that if they want fee-for-carriage, they ought to just negotiate with the cable and satellite companies.  If the broadcasters got what they wanted, great.  If not, the broadcasters could just withdraw their content from transmission.

What the...?

Pay me, or I keep my stuff.  Isn't that the free market?  What is von Finckenstein playing at?




CRTC chairman says that despite getting assurances, he is not assured

The saga of Canadian television seems absurd.  While being questioned by Heritage Committee MPs on solving the crisis that has struck Canadian television, Konrad von Finckenstein explained that the problem he has with fee-for-carriage is that he has not been given "enough assurances" that the new revenue stream would be used by broadcasters to support local broadcasters.

This despite the fact that both CTVglobemedia and CanWest stated a commitment to support local stations with fee-for-carriage revenue in a written submission to the CRTC.

This despite the fact that both Ivan Fecan (CTVglobemedia) and Leonard Asper (CanWest) stated a commitment to support local stations with fee-for-carriage revenue in a hearing in front of the chairman of the CRTC.

Just what does this guy want?




The CRTC is refusing to act to save television; time for government to act

In an appearance before MPs, CRTC head Konrad von Finckenstein explained that he doesn't have the answer on how to save television, nor will he implement an answer that people have been trying to explain to the CRTC for years.

It is time for the government to move on this.  It looks like there is enough support within parliament to pass rule changes and bypass the CRTC.




TV advertising primer

I'm no expert on the subject of the economics of TV advertising, but I've written quite a few pieces recently on CanWest and the need to redesign the fee model for television.  Based on comments and emails, I think quite a few people are still not clear just how cable and satellite distribution hurts broadcasters, and why broadcasters are owed some sort of compensation.

So I'm going to try and explain how it all works.




Will Phil Lind of Rogers Communications back fee-for-carriage now?

I doubt it.  But in 2008, when Leonard Asper of CanWest and Ivan Fecan of CTVglobemedia put aside their differences to jointly address the CRTC on the question of carriage fees, Phil Lind of Rogers Communications dismissed their concerns on the basis that there was no need for carriage fees, since the broadcasters were profitable at the time.

Does that mean that Phil Lind will support carriage fees today?  Someone should ask him.




No bailout for the CRTC!

With news that the government is looking at helping out Canada's private broadcasters, it is imperative that whatever else happens, this does not a result into a bailout for the CRTC.  The regulator needs to be held to account for its considerable level of responsibility for the situation that we find ourselves in.




Will a permanent change for Canadian television come in on time?

It would be churlish of me to point out that setting up the rules for Canadian television broadcasters such that they actually have a chance to succeed is something that ought to have been done years ago.  But better late than never, as long as it doesn't turn out to be too late.

Unfortunately, it seems like it going to be a photo finish.




CanWest needs a future in order to survive the present

CanWest Global has dodged the bankruptcy bullet for the moment.  First, the Aspers got an extension from creditors to mid-April.  Now they are using this time (and an injection of funds from an old debt) to work with bondholders to come up with a solution that both sides can live with.

This is great news...but that success is based on convincing banks and bondholders that there is a profitable future for CanWest.  The CRTC can do a lot to make that happen.




My TV is broken -- and together we have an opportunity to fix it

My TV is broken.  Oh, I still get a picture and sound from it, but the Canadian TV model is breaking down.  I would like to fix it, but like all good medicine, a lot of people are not going to like the taste of it.

Unfortunately, the right solution will most adversely affect people who seem to think that they are the only ones with good taste, period.




Last Seven Posts
CRTC chairman says that despite getting assurances, he is not assured
Thursday, March 26, 2009 at 07:21 AM

The CRTC is refusing to act to save television; time for government to act
Thursday, March 26, 2009 at 03:42 AM

TV advertising primer
Monday, March 23, 2009 at 03:45 PM

Will Phil Lind of Rogers Communications back fee-for-carriage now?
Thursday, March 19, 2009 at 02:36 PM

No bailout for the CRTC!
Thursday, March 19, 2009 at 10:01 AM

Will a permanent change for Canadian television come in on time?
Wednesday, March 18, 2009 at 11:59 PM

CanWest needs a future in order to survive the present
Sunday, March 15, 2009 at 07:58 AM

Archives

There are extensive archives arranged by month and by category.

Canadian Blogging

Create Commons License 2.5
Angry in the Great White North by Steve Janke is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5 Canada License. Based on a work at stevejanke.com.
Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict
[Valid Atom 1.0]
Valid CSS!