David Chernushenko is resigning from his high-level position of Senior Deputy to the Leader in the Green Party, and from his position as Green Party nominee for the riding of Ottawa Centre.
This is a serious blow for the Green Party, as David Chernushenko was the Green Party's most successful candidate ever in a general election, and a member of the National Round Table on the Economy and the Environment, providing policy advice to the Conservative governmnent.
But then those are likely the reasons he left.

The Green Party is in the news again. A senior member of the party, David Chernushenko, is resigning his position of Senior Deputy to the Leader in the Green Party, as well as stepping down as the nominee for the riding of Ottawa Centre:
A prominent Green party figure who lost the leadership contest to Elizabeth May last year is withdrawing as a candidate for the next election and quitting his post as senior deputy to Ms. May.
David Chernushenko, who twice carried the Green banner in Ottawa Centre, says he is leaving for his own business and environmental interests, but hinted in an interview he believes Ms. May is shouldering too great a workload in the party and should also share the public spotlight with other party members.
"I would certainly encourage her, for her own health, to try to share the load more," Mr. Chernushenko said yesterday.
That's very big of David Chernushenko, but really, I wonder just how concerned he is for Elizabeth May's health. I don't believe he wishes her ill, but what I'm hearing is that his departure is really more about internal party politics.
Some Green bloggers are saying as much:
David Chernushenko, the former deputy leader of Canada's Green Party, stepped down from his post today. Citing "business and environmental interests", but speculation is ripe that Chernushenko disagrees with party leader Elizabeth May's practices and internal policies.
Just what could be at the root of this friction? An interesting exchange happened during the Green Party leadership debate, when David Chernushenko was running against Elizabeth May to be the Green Party leader:
David Chernushenko:
I do however have to ask a question of Elizabeth and she'll be able to rebut when it comes. I'd like you to explain why you felt it necessary to call me and Jim Harris during the last election and ask us to consider asking Green Party candidates to stand aside in ridings where our running…Elizabeth May interrupts:
That's not what I did David.EM:
No, I don't like my actions being mischaracterized in a public debate and I apologize for interrupting David but I was a bit taken aback. What I felt at the end of the last election, and we were about a week from the vote, and I did talk to Jim Harris about it and I did call David as deputy leader because I felt the Green Party could take centre stage at that moment - we'd been denied the stage all through the election - to talk about putting principle ahead of power; to talk about what could happen if Harper was elected to all the platforms we cared about. Beyond that I didn't have a very well formed idea at all. I was calling them in desperation to say 'What could we do?' Could you for instance interest the Liberals if they were interested in talking about proportional representation? Was there room for a coalition there? We had about a week. I admit I was desperate. I had no actual plan but I certainly didn't call to suggest that people should stand aside for no reason. It was a question of what we could do to ensure the Green Party was front and center.DC:
I do raise this here and I feel I have to because the same question was asked in the Montreal debate and I believe what was being asked of me and of Jim was - you posed the question; would I consider - would it make sense to ask Green Party candidates to step aside in riding where by doing so we would help to prevent a Stephen Harper government from being elected and I equally am very concerned about a Harper government but my response was no, I couldn't do that. I did not believe that was a principled thing for the Green Party to do because in fact I could never - we are running on principle - not running to try to keep one government out. We're running on trying to bring Green in and I as a candidate and one who has been a candidate several times could never ask another candidate; could never ask another riding association to have their candidate step down.
During the 2006 election, Elizabeth May was the executive director of the Sierra Club of Canada. So her request that David Chernushenko step aside in order to prevent the Conservatives from winning a seat because of vote splitting could be perceived as meddling.
But what I find interesting is that David Chernushenko was never likely to win that seat, nor did his participation in the democratic process result in the Conservatives winning the seat or even coming close:
Paul Dewar (NDP): 24,611
Richard Mahoney (Liberal): 19,458
Keith Fountain (Conservative): 15,126
David Chernushenko (Green): 6,766
Indeed, the NDP won the seat, and for those Greens who worry about vote-splitting, it is usually the votes leached from the NDP candidate that needs to be prevented. But it needs to be noted that David Chernushenko's showing was by far the best for a Green Party candidate in any election.
But with one week to go before the vote, Elizabeth May was in a state of desperation (not a good thing for a leader, by the way). And so she tried to get David Chernushenko to step aside so that...what?
Make sure the Conservatives wouldn't win? It wasn't even close.
Make sure the NDP won? They did without requiring the Green Party to concede.
Shift the Green vote to the Liberals and change the outcome? Mathematically possible, but only if every Green voter did exactly as they were told. Not likely, since a lot of Green voters would vote NDP as their second choice.
To somehow hurt David Chernushenko? Well, there aren't too many theories left.
Or is it simply that in the desperate state brought on by the fact that Canadian votes had had enough of Liberal sleaze and so were looking to the credible alternative offered up by the well-run Conservative campaign, Elizabeth May was thrashing around, and David Chernushenko ended up getting the strange request from the Sierra Club to quit the race.
To David Chernushenko, electing the Green Party matters. It is the reason to have a political party. For Elizabeth May, though, the real goal is to hurt the Conservatives. The environment comes second for Elizabeth May. I say that because it seems to me that electing some Green MPs in an election in which the Conservatives win would do more for the environment than electing no Greens members whatsoever in a Liberal win.
Especially if that Liberal win came about in part because the Green Party rolled over and played dead. If Elizabeth May thinks the Liberals would then feel beholden to the Green Party, she is sadly mistaken.
But Elizabeth May, both in 2006 and since becoming Green Party leader, has shown that for her the Green Party is just a pawn in her struggle to make sure Conservatives don't run the country. I wonder if David Chernushenko is fed up with being a pawn. It would explain why he is completing disconnecting himself from the party right now (except for maintaining his party membership), and declaring that he would focus on his role on the National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy, run by the government of Canada.
Working on the NRTEE to provide the Conservative government recommendations on how to proceed on environmental initiatives while keeping an eye on Canada's economic health is the sort of thing that has the potential to help the Conservatives. Indeed, David Chernushenko was appointed by Prime Minister Stephen Harper to the NRTEE, in part, no doubt, because of David Chernushenko's impressive showing in the 2006 election, where his 6,766 votes made him the only Green Party candidate to reach the threshold required for campaign reimbursement. That sort of performance gains you credibility.
That's the campaign Elizabath May wanted him to abandon because Stephen Harper had to be stopped. That's the credibility Elizabeth May didn't want David Chernushenko to have.
That David Chernushenko did so well as a candidate, and then accepted an appointment to the NRTEE from Stephen Harper, is not likely to have helped his working relationship with Elizabeth May. And that May is actively pursuing a strategy of selectively removing Green Party candidates from certain ridings in the belief that she can topple the Conservatives in the next election is no doubt a repugnant notion to the Green Party's most successful candidate ever.
Skew my story on Skewz.com
Rate political news for their bias, read related stories, and leave your own skewed commentary
Search for more opinions from Canadian bloggers on these related keywords
David Chernushenko Elizabeth May Green Party Ottawa Centre Canada
Sphere presents related news articles and blog posts
Sphere It!
At the end of the day Conservatives will do more for the 'environment' than the LPoC.
As for the greenies I don't want to live in a cave.
Posted by: DrWright at July 17, 2007 01:17 PM
I suspect that David Chernushenko is more concerned about HIS health than the health of Eliza-May.
Look, I'm a woman but I have to say that anytime I've had a female boss, she micromanages her workers into the ground. That's a generalization, I agree, but I make a generalization because this has been my most common experience with female bosses. They don't give you space to manoeuvre; they too often think they're your mother and seem to be compelled to have their fingers in every pie.
Give me space, lady!
Though male bosses come with their own set of problems, I have found that they tend to give you enough rope to hang yourself rather than strangling you with it, as too many female head honchos are wont.
'Sorry I have to say that. I'm not being sexist or gender-biased; I'm just stating A FACT.
I suspect that Eliza-May suffocates those around her, in her frenzy to micromanage HER agenda. 'Looks like she's cut off Chernushenko's oxygen, without which he can't stay Green.
'Looks like PMSH's appointment of Chernushenko to the National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy is the kind of wiggle room this guy's looking for.
What'd I tell ya'?
Posted by: 'been around the block at July 17, 2007 02:21 PM
Interesting, BATB. I was the happy recipient of 30 years of male supervision in a male-dominated industry. The liberals and libbers can say what they want but as you say, the men provided me incredible liberty to make things happen and left me to make it happen using methods of my own device. During that time I was able to plan and implement strategies with impact to the entire industry as well as to my own organization. After all this time, I now have a female boss and she is something else. Undeniably brilliant and deserving, but unable to think or take a single step outside the proverbial box. I cause her no end of angst because my entire modus operandi is 'flying under the radar.' Groupthink is a major failing in this organization and all the senior women here fall in line with or before the guys do. I suspect EM is attempting to hobble DC to diminish his visibility to sustain her current standing, such as it is. You know, many liberals demonize corporations yet the brutal acts that play out in politics are far more machiavellian than what I've ever seen in this business.
Posted by: iowavette at July 17, 2007 02:48 PM
Excellent article, Steve! I'd add that Elizabeth May is on record as saying that she chose to run against Peter McKay rather than a winnable seat because she and her bud David Orchard are still bitter about the PC-Alliance merger. She literally admitted to the media that she is running in McKay's riding out of spite to settle an old score.
Combined with her well publicized coalition deal with Dion, her admission that she will allow Green riding associations to voluntarily refuse to run candidates in order to defeat Conservatives, and your excellent post, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that Elizabeth May is more interested in settling old scores and keeping the Conservatives out of power than either principle or getting Greens elected.
Posted by: Homie at July 17, 2007 03:01 PM
batb: she micromanages her workers into the ground
...guess ya never had an accountant as a boss.
Whoowhie. Talk about accounting (excuse the pun) for everything you do or order.
David Chernushenko looks like a normal guy...who'd guess he was Green?
Posted by: tomax7 at July 17, 2007 03:25 PM
FWIW, I knew Chernushenko years ago at Queen's and, whilst I do not hold his political views, I quite liked him- bright, clever, perhaps a bit earnest. Certainly, principled. I don't doubt Janke's analysis above at all.
Posted by: at July 17, 2007 06:09 PM
where I work the wanted to do a coup and get rid of our male boss, sounds good but when i realized who was likely to replace him I couldn't back it. If there is one thing trudeaupia has taught me, things can always get worse, much worse.
Posted by: DrWright at July 17, 2007 06:35 PM
He doesn't want to be a Poodle of the Liberal Party? How could he reject such an honour!!!? lol, lol...
Posted by: philanthropist at July 18, 2007 12:24 AM
I wager that the Dion-May deal involves a lot more than made public. If May wins Central Nova, I have no doubt she will be folded into the Liberal party in some high profile capacity .. either in opposition or government.
If she loses, there may be a soft and furry landing for her; after all she gave Dion the blessing of the Green Party, and that's got to be worth a career move that will pay off for a lifetime.
Posted by: Robert at July 20, 2007 10:32 AM
I wager that the Dion-May deal involves a lot more than made public. If May wins Central Nova, I have no doubt she will be folded into the Liberal party in some high profile capacity .. either in opposition or government.
If she loses, there may be a soft and furry landing for her; after all she gave Dion the blessing of the Green Party, and that's got to be worth a career move that will pay off for a lifetime.
Posted by: Observer at July 20, 2007 10:33 AM