a blog about news and politics by steve janke
 

Reciprocal agreement to aid law enforcement comes under attack from Liberals and NDP

Foreign law enforcement officials will find it easier to bring their weapons into Canada in the pursuit of their duties. Of course, the same goes for Canadian law enforcement pursuing criminals in other jurisdictions. Apparently this is a threat to Canada's sovereignty, or so says Liberal MP Dan McTeague, who brings up an incident in which unarmed Canadian border officials abandoned their posts in the face of armed American criminals and the US law enforcement giving chase. That's an odd example to bring up, because the truth is that until the Conservative government started arming our border guards, Canadian border officials depended on US law enforcement to use their weapons on our side of the border.




The Canadian government has entered into a reciprocal agreement that would simplify the process that allows Canadian and American law enforcement officers carry their weapons while operating in either country. Though the regulation speaks of law enforcement officials of other countries, the emphasis is on American officials.

Of course, being about guns and Americans, Canada's left is up in arms:

The federal government would not comment on the proposal, which NDP justice critic Joe Comartin said would give "carte blanche" to foreign police officers.

"Canadians aren't generally speaking enamoured with guns. I don't think they'll be very happy to find out foreign police forces are operating in our country, armed," Comartin told CTV News.

Comartin and Dan McTeague, Liberal MP and opposition critic for consular affairs, decried the lack of public consultation by the government on the proposal.

McTeague said he understands it's important to expedite the ability of federal air marshals to do their job.

"This, however, opens the door to a number of real concerns that I don't think police or politicians or Canadians have had a chance to look into," McTeague told CTV News.

"Issues of sovereignty, issues of the kind of guns and duty weapons that are being brought in, may very well be inconsistent with the laws we have on prohibition of weapons."

McTeague pointed to a 2005 incident in which U.S. police crashed through the border, firing their guns at a suspect who tried to escape into Canadian territory at the Detroit-Windsor border.

It was a "very serious issue and brought into question of sovereignty and the question of reach here," said McTeague.

Let's consider the question of sovereignty at the border. Under the Liberals, Canada seemed to not care one jot about sovereignty at the border:

[Canadian Border Services Agency spokeswoman Faith St. John] said the agency received the warning at about 4:30 p.m., local time, from its American counterpart that an armed suspect might be heading towards the border.

"CBSA officers exercised their right to refuse work about half an hour later at the Douglas (Peace Arch) and Pacific Highway border crossings," she said.

The walkout then spread to the Huntington crossing 80 kilometres east of Vancouver.

It's the third incident in a month when a Canadian border point closed as unarmed officers fled over the threat of armed Americans approaching.

The Northgate Report alleged that successive Liberal governments rejected repeated recommendations to arm border guards. According to Northgate, reports that made these recommendations were altered by government officials before being released.

Maybe Liberals think sovereignty means being different. If American border officials are armed, ours won't be. That's an expression of Canadian sovereignty to a Liberal. If American border officials defend the border, ours won't. That's an expression of Canadian sovereignty to a Liberal.

In fact, Canadian border officials have in the past depended on armed US officers being willing to bring their firearms over the border:

It was discovered that U.S. Customs management has directed their Officers to not take their sidearms with them if they go into Canada to assist Canadian Officers. Fortunately for some Canadian Officers, this policy appears not to always be strictly followed. The reliance on U.S. Customs by some Canadian border locations is a verifiable sign of the risk to the lives of Canadian Border Services Officers and further demonstrates the need to provide sidearms to Officers in these locations.

At a minimum of 12 locations (see Table 12), U.S. Customs and/or Canadian Border Services Officers reported incidents of U.S. Customs providing an armed back-up to CBSA Officers. Northgate associates suspect it occurs at other remote POE across Canada.

At the locations listed in Table 12, U.S. Officers, some of whom were interviewed for the Study, would keep watch of the Canadian PIL. When they saw a car sit too long in the lane, they would walk over to see if the Canadian Officer needed assistance. Officers also did not wait for the U.S. to wander over and check on the Canadian Officer and called U.S. Customs requesting their armed assistance.

Also interviewed was one Officer who stated he hit his PASS panic button during a dangerous situation, because he knew the PASS panic button system automatically called U.S. Customs first.

Under the Conservative government, border guards will be trained and armed:

The newly-elected Conservatives say they will make good as soon as possible on their leader's pledge to arm Canadian border guards, following a shootout on the Canada-U.S. border on Tuesday night.

The Conservative MP for the area says when Canadian border guards are facing a gun fight, batons and pepper spray just won't do. "It simply reinforces the fact that our customs officers work in a very dangerous situation," said Russ Hiebert.

"And as a Conservative government we're committed to giving them the resources and the equipment. And that includes giving them the sidearms that they need to handle these kinds of dangerous situations."

The union says border guards will continue to refuse to work whenever they feel threatened, until the government delivers on its promise to give them guns.

And as for the threat to Canada's sovereignty, the fact is that the real threat has been from institutionalized Liberal government inaction that has forced Canadian border guards to let the Americans become the de facto armed defence of Canada. Canadian border officials allowing Americans to bring their weapons over on an ad hoc basis undermines our sovereignty, not an agreement that formalizes and codifies the practise in a transparent way. Now that our officers will be given the tools they need to stand guard at the border, Canada's sovereignty is on a more secure footing. Entering into an agreement that allows both Canadian and American officers pursue their duties across the border when required strengthens both sides. Better yet, the border will cease to be the goal line for criminals fleeing authorities, and that makes us all safer.


Skew my story on Skewz.com
Rate political news for their bias, read related stories, and leave your own skewed commentary


Search for more opinions from Canadian bloggers on these related keywords
 Canadian Border Services Agency  US Customs  Dan McTeague  Joe Comartin  Conservative Party  Liberal Party  NDP  Canada  Northgate Report 


Sphere presents related news articles and blog posts
Sphere It!


Trackbacks
URI: http://haloscan.com/tb/agwnblog/231484

Trackback Submission Form



 

Comments

Figures the leftards would be against this, anything to do with practicality and common sense will always evade these types who are suffering from Leftist Mental Disorder.

Posted by: Bruce Randall at June 26, 2007 10:40 AM



McTeague is always looking for something to snipe about now he's reaching back to 2005 for an incident when he and the Libranos were in power. They did squat about border issues.

Comartin and his Lefty peace brigade, time warped in the Peacenik era of pot smoking and free love, want to have unarmed Border guards risk their lives and the lives of others when they can't stop criminals.

Maybe it's time we ask Jack Layton and his bunch to have a little stint at some of the more remote border crossings,mouthy Dan McTeague too. Some of these Lefties need to be whacked before they see sense.

Posted by: Libby at June 26, 2007 11:45 AM



Steve, you hit the nail on the head. The Liberals & NDP seem to feel that we must be different from (if not antagonistic to) the US in order to be "independent."

Posted by: Brian in Calgary at June 26, 2007 11:47 AM



So McAsswipe and his sidekick Miller the wanker are correct. Guns were getting in from the US. What they don't say is that it was the Fiberals that wanted to allow these gun toting thugs in, then give them citizenship. They need to keep up their number of voters somehow.

No wonder they are pissed that Harper armed the Canadian border and custom officials

Posted by: at June 26, 2007 12:01 PM



Typical leftist response to anything is "its a very complicated issue" which is a collorary to the idea that as its too complicated for you simple rubes to understand we who are so much more enlightened will instruct you on the proper response.

Obviously the rightside response is always from a commonsense perspective that works from the assumption that folks are smart enough (regardless of level of education) to think for themselves and come to their own conclusions.

I thought about this when I heard the so-called report on CTV this AM with the anti-american preamble to frame the story.

Posted by: gimbol at June 26, 2007 12:05 PM



oh come on... this is hard to believe?

they put so much effort in the "guns in our cities" campaign they can't possibly take a different position now without looking stupider.

Posted by: Sierra at June 26, 2007 12:13 PM



Why do you think these alleged criminals want to come to Canada in the first place. Why don't they head for Mexico hmmmm. They know what will happen then.

Posted by: Fergy at June 26, 2007 01:53 PM



This better have been thought through to avoid any future abuse.

OIC's anyone? Ask firearms owners how OIC's have enhanced their lives.

I'm on the fence on this.

Posted by: Nightmare at June 27, 2007 12:52 AM



What future abuse ?

Anyone who's worked along the border in law enforcement or any emergency service, as well as anyone who's served in the military can tell you that the Americans are damned good neighbours. They are always there when a hand is needed and are generous to a fault when it comes to providing resources for training purposes.

I like and admire the Americans. Always have and always will. That doesn't make me less of a Canadian. It just means that I know enough about our own achievements that I can appreciate other peoples'.

Canada Day is just around the corner. How many of the opinion columns this Sunday will be based around the fact that "at least we're not Americans" ? If last year is any indication, most -if not all - of them will. To all liberals and far too many conservatives, that's the source of our national pride -at least we're not Americans. That's both wrong-headed and just plain sad. It's also rude -and we're not supposed to be like that, are we ? I think this knee-jerk, uninformed anti-Americanism is our national embarrassment.
Sorry to get preachy and off-topic. It's a big deal to me.

As to the matter at hand. I think closer cooperation with the Americans is just fine. It's not letting the camel's nose under our tent -the Yanks have enough problems of their own without trying to run this country as well. The Libs and the NDP are like a bunch of prissy little schoolgirls when it comes to anybody carrying a gun. And they want us all to be like that. If they ever achieve that goal, then you had better thank your various gods that we have the Americans as neighbours.

Posted by: up north at June 27, 2007 12:07 PM