Angry in the Great White North
More contaminants in the pet food detected even as China stonewalls
Thursday, April 12, 2007 at 09:23 PM

Read other posts by Steve Janke published by the National Post

Leader

Cornell scientists have found a second contaminant in pet food sample. But they don't know what it is, or how it got there. Meanwhile the Chinese refuse to help, even as we learn about the high rate of rejection of Chinese food at US ports.



Main Story

Scientists are skeptical that melamine, which is not known to be toxic, was responsible for the deaths of dozens, perhaps hundreds, of dogs and cats who consumed pet foods made by Menu Foods. The search continues for the real cause of the pet food contamination, and Cornell researchers think they are onto something:

Researchers, however, are making strides toward uncovering what has sickened cats and dogs nationwide. A lead scientist said yesterday he is convinced a second contaminant was in the wheat gluten, which FDA and independent researchers said was laced with high amounts of melamine, a chemical used in plastics.

Dr. Richard Goldstein, associate professor of medicine at Cornell University's College of Veterinary Medicine and a kidney specialist who is researching the outbreak's health impact on pets, said he and other researchers saw what they believe is a second contaminant in the gluten and the urine of infected animals, but have yet to identify it. Cornell is among labs working with the FDA.

"The concerted effort now is to identify what else is in there, and what's in the crystals" of infected animals' urine and tissue, Goldstein said.

As I suggested, the melamine is not the cause, but melamine might be a marker for what wheat gluten was contaminated with a cocktail of chemicals, one or more of which might be responsible for the sickness of the animals:

Under the microscope and even to the naked eye, the contaminated gluten looks different from uncontaminated samples, Goldstein said. Researchers see melamine granules and other colored granules throughout the gluten, he said.

"There appears to be other things in there, other than the melamine, but identifying what they are is a long process," he said.

The FDA, Cornell and other researchers found melamine in high concentrations in the gluten -- up to 6.6 percent of the product.

Even so, they do not believe the melamine made the animals sick, although they said it is a marker for tracking the outbreak, because the crystal found in the melamine and in animals' urine and tissue is distinctive to this outbreak.

Meanwhile, as I predicted, the Chinese are not cooperating. Though the wheat gluten exported by Xuzhou Anying Biologic Technology Development Co. Ltd was definitely contaminated with melamine, both the company and the Chinese government are stonewalling investigators:

Michael Rogers, director of the FDA's field investigations division, told the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review the agency has asked the Chinese government for help investigating the gluten and the supplier, Xuzhou Anying Biologic Technology Development Co. Ltd., based in Jiangsu province.

The FDA is disappointed with slow and incomplete Chinese responses, Rogers said.

"I usually don't speak in terms of cooperative or not cooperative," he said.

Chu Maoming, spokesman for the Chinese Embassy in Washington D.C., did not return calls or an e-mail requesting comment.

This matters because a lot more than wheat gluten destined for pet food came out of that company:

Federal investigators haven't determined whether Xuzhou Anying shipped other food products to the United States, or what other Chinese companies it sold wheat gluten to that, in turn, might have been shipped here, Rogers said.

Xuzhou Anying's Web site said it also exports carrots, garlic, ginger, corn protein powder, vegetables and feed. Rogers said Chinese officials have not responded to the U.S. government's question about whether any products other than wheat gluten were shipped here.

"We're certainly reviewing all products from this source," he said. Since the recall, the company has shipped only wheat gluten to the United States, but U.S. officials still are unsure what might have been shipped prior to the recall, Rogers said.

The real shame is that we should have seen this coming. Chinese food imports to the United States are routinely rejected for poor quality or dangerous contamination:

The list of Chinese food exports rejected at American ports reads like a chef's nightmare: pesticide-laden pea pods, drug-laced catfish, filthy plums and crawfish contaminated with salmonella.

Over the past 25 years, Chinese agricultural exports to the U.S. surged nearly 20-fold to $2.26 billion last year, led by poultry products, sausage casings, shellfish, spices and apple juice.

Inspectors from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration are able to inspect only a tiny percentage of the millions of shipments that enter the U.S. each year.

Even so, shipments from China were rejected at the rate of about 200 per month this year, the largest from any country, compared to about 18 for Thailand, and 35 for Italy, also big exporters to the U.S., according to data posted on the FDA's Web site.

Chinese products are bounced for containing pesticides, antibiotics and other potentially harmful chemicals, and false or incomplete labeling that sometimes omits the producer's name.

Product of China. Look for it at your store.

Search for more opinions from Canadian bloggers on these related keywords
 pet food  recall  poison  China  wheat gluten  melamine  aminopterin  contamination  Cornell  Food and Drug Administration  FDA  Richard Goldstein  Menu Foods  Xuzhou Anying