a blog about news and politics by steve janke
 

The Chinese government rejects any responsibility for the pet food poisoning

The Chinese government is weighing in on the pet food contamination that has been linked to imported wheat gluten. Not surprisingly, the Chinese are insisting they were not responsible.




I wrote that a challenge facing investigaters trying to understand how a massive pet food contamination happened would be dealing with Chinese authorities:

China said Thursday that it had no record of exporting any agricultural products that could have tainted the pet food that has been linked to the deaths of at least 16 cats and dogs in the United States.

The Chinese government said that wheat gluten, which has been linked to a pet food recall in North America, had not been exported from China to the United States or Canada. The government also disputed some reports that a chemical called Aminopterin, a rat poison, could have entered the pet food supplies in North America from China. The government said the chemical is not used in rat poison in China.

"China has nothing to do with the pet poisoning incident," the government said in a statement on the Web site of the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine.

Of course, we know that the Chinese government is not likely to know what poisons are actually in use -- aminopterin, melamine, cyromazine, TETS, or all of those and more. Nor are they likely to care.

The Chinese are pleading ignorance, and suggesting mysterious shadowy figures are responsible:

ChemNutra, a Las Vegas company that supplies pet food makers, said it imported 792 metric tons of wheat gluten from Xuzhou between November 29 and March 8. The products were then shipped from its Kansas City warehouse to three pet food makers and one distributor of pet food ingredients in the United States and Canada, it said.

The wheat gluten ended up in pet food made for several companies, including Menu Foods, of Ontario, and Hill's Pet Nutrition, a division of Colgate-Palmolive.

Xuzhou Anying said it never shipped the packages.

"Maybe some company bought our product and exported it without our knowledge," said [Mao Lijun, the general manager of Xuzhou Anying Biologic Technology Development].

This despite insistence that the product was indeed bought from China:

Earlier Thursday, The Associated Press reported that another official working at Xuzhou Anying had acknowledged that the company shipped wheat gluten to the United States.

Despite the confusion, the United States has halted all wheat gluten imports from the China. I think there's a fair chance the Chinese will suddenly "discover" the responsible manager, punish him very publicly, and insist that the problem has been solved in order to start up exports again.

That would a shame, because there is still a lot of doubt as to whether the melamine contamination could really be responsible for the deaths of the pets reported. If the Chinese continue to be obstructive, or switch gears to play a deceptive role, then we might never know what really happened. And that means it could happen again.

Check out other entries from the Colgate toothpaste category
Results will open in a new window.


Check out what Canadian bloggers have posted about Colgate toothpaste
Results will open in a new window.


Check out what has been written about Colgate toothpaste on the web
Results will open in a new window.


Check out other entries from the True Crime category
Results will open in a new window.


Skew my story on Skewz.com
Rate political news for their bias, read related stories, and leave your own skewed commentary


Search for more opinions from Canadian bloggers on these related keywords
 China  pet food  wheat gluten  melamine  aminopterin  cyromazine  TETS  Menu Foods  ChemNutra  Xuzhou Anying  Hill's Pet Nutrition 


Sphere presents related news articles and blog posts
Sphere It!


Trackbacks
URI: http://haloscan.com/tb/agwnblog/221756

Trackback Submission Form



 

Comments

Whether China is responsible or not should be a moot point. Do we not have agencies like CFIA that are supposed to check all products coming into Canada? A few years ago it was discovered that honey from China was contaminated with a fungicide. We stopped importing that honey. A while later honey was bweing imported into Canada from countries that had never exported honey before. Alberta was the only the only province that inspected that honey and found that it to was contaminated with the fungicide--China was re-routing honey to other countries to be sold abroad. The ROC continued to import honey from those countries. So, instead of blaming China we should be asking why this contaminated product was allowed to be distributed in the first place. This proves that our system is weak in that department, and it is us who are really responsible for this devestation.

Posted by: George at April 5, 2007 01:45 PM



Wow George!

Bit of a masochist, are we? China poisons us and we're responsible???

You sure seem to hate yourself, and whatever countries you mean by "our system" Anyway, you might as well flog yourself as well.

That's

Posted by: Larry at April 5, 2007 06:43 PM



Do we not have agencies like CFIA that are supposed to check all products coming into Canada?

Er, not as such. But we have lots of agencies which are very good at getting great jobs for lots of their buddies, crafting pay and benefits packages which are an order of magnitude better than the average schmoe whom they are allegedly dedicated to protecting, siphoning off money to favored contractors, and then double-dipping when they retire and get jobs with the contractors or even with their old agency. Oh yes, and turning all of their failures into a demand for bigger budgets, bigger salaries, bigger headcounts, more foreign trips to "study" and "share information", more cars, computers and other toys, more regulatory power, etc. And when they screw up, there is always a loud chorus backing them up by screaming that government should "do more!" It's a beautiful scam, is it not?

Then there are private producers and entrepreneurs whose jobs and property are on the line and who have 100% motivation to not screw up and not poison their customers. No one has to tell them to "do something", they're busting their butts every day to do their best, and no one is going to give them a promotion, a new office or lend them more money if they screw up (except maybe a government loan, by hinting that the votes in their riding are up for grabs)

I'd trust a greedy capitalist who can only make money by selling me something I need and by not poisoning me before I'd trust an unfireable government knob crying crocodile tears and posing as my servant, anyday.

Posted by: at April 5, 2007 06:46 PM



06:46pm--exactly--I would trust the producer to protect us better than the government stooges we pay to 'protect' us. At the same time--these government departments plead ignorance every time something like this happens. They are totally unaccountable to anyone, and the only thing they excel at is pointing the finger at others, eg--the farmer who fed the wrong feed or the animals/food product that is imported into Canada was contaminated before being imported so it is not their fault. They spin their wheels and waste our money on their useless make work projects to enhance their own importance. But as usual we are pay and receive nothing in return.
Health Canada has the same track record. I am not absolving China of responsibility, but at the same time we have to ask the pertinent question of why on earth we are importing wheat gluten, or any grain product for that matter, into Canada at the expense of our own farmers.
Either we get real with inspections and accountability or we only use home-grown products in human and animal food products and only import that which we cannot produce ourselves.

Posted by: George at April 5, 2007 07:46 PM



The chinese also denied any knowledge of SARS, until international pressure forced them to 'fess up.

So the same lying, communist/totalitarian government denies any wrongdoing in the tainted pet food issue.

And anybody is surprised because... (?)

mhb23re
at gmail d0t calm

Posted by: mhb at April 6, 2007 12:27 PM



The Chinese government also denies responsibility for the massacre that occurred on June 04, 1989. Nothing they do or which is done there ever seems to be their fault.

Posted by: Brian in Calgary at April 6, 2007 03:48 PM



They are not responsible in the same way Chretien and Martin were not responsible for adscam.

Posted by: DrWright at April 7, 2007 10:33 AM



So the same lying, communist/totalitarian government denies any wrongdoing in the tainted pet food issue.

And anybody is surprised because... (?)

The only really surprising thing is that otherwise intelligent, alert people would fail to see that the same logical fallacies and the same pernicious inducements to lie and steal are built into both the Chinese government and their own government. Regardless of which party's hacks and fixers are calling the shots and regardless of how many elections are called.

Posted by: at April 7, 2007 02:03 PM



Anon at April 7,2007, 2:03pm:

Sorry, I missed the part of your historical reference or reasoning that compared problems with the Canadian Federal Government with China, viz. (i) Denying massacring its citizens for public assembly and (ii) Lying on a worldwide scale by denying the country's infection from a fatal inhaled respiratory disease.

Be a dear and clear that up for us, would you?

If you fail to see the difference between Canada (admittedly with its own political warts) and China, you're living in the wrong country, Bubba.

mhb23re

Posted by: mhb at April 8, 2007 10:16 PM