a blog about news and politics by steve janke
 

According to David Suzuki, Kyoto targets are always achievable

When David Suzuki was asked last month if Canada's Kyoto targets are achievable, he said it would be difficult. I have a problem with this. My problem is that two years ago, an eminent proponent for Kyoto said at the time meeting the Kyoto targets would be difficult. So seven years has turned to five, and Canada's emissions have grown, not shrunk. In effect, we've taken a difficult task, increased the scope dramatically, and signficantly compressed the timeline.

The project manager in me says the window for success has slammed shut.

Unless that other climate change expert was wrong in characterizing the situation as so tough two years ago. Maybe it was well within reach. It has only been between then and now that it has become a tough problem. If so, it might not be too late. But I don't think that's the case. I think this person was right, and that reaching the Kyoto targets two years ago was a very difficult task, which is also why I think it's impossible now.

And I also know David Suzuki would never disagree with a word this person says.




David Suzuki was asked on February 12, 2007, point blank, whether Canada could meet its Kyoto commitments at this late date:

Q Are Canada's Kyoto targets reachable?

A It's become very difficult at this point, but there is a way to do it, particularly with carbon taxes on an international and even interprovincial scale.

Now recall that under Kyoto, Canada must cut emissions of greenhouse gases to 6% below 1990 levels by 2012, only five years away. The problem is that in the time since Canada signed on to Kyoto, emissions have risen by 30%. So instead of knocking down emissions by 15% in 10 years, we have to cut by 50% or more in five years or less.

No wonder it seems impossible, especially since it seemed like a difficult proposition two years ago. But then maybe it wasn't so hard then. In that case, then maybe the time frittered away and the increase in emissions, as bad as it sounds, has not put the Kyoto targets out of reach.

So which is it?

I suggest getting the opinion of a respected climate change advocate from a couple of years back:

Letter from David Suzuki

Yes, that's David Suzuki's signature on the bottom.

So in February 2005, almost exactly two years ago, David Suzuki tells Darren Barefoot that "[t]he Kyoto Protocol kicks in this month but will be tough to fulfill."

What was tough in 2005 has only got tougher. David Suzuki goes on to say that Sustainability Within a Generation "can be achieved if we start now." The Sustainability program is a superset of Kyoto put forth by the Suzuki Foundation. The plan is to meet Kyoto in 2012, then move on to even deeper cuts by 2050. The program runs from 2004 through 2030, and success in meeting Kyoto is marked as a milestone in the program timeline (see page 16).

It stands to reason that if a target in 2050 required action in February 2005, then there is even less flexibility in when to start the effort to reach the Kyoto target in 2012.

What does this do to Suzuki's credibility? Two years ago, the Kyoto goals were hard and we had to start immediately. Today, the Kyoto goals are hard and we have to start immediately. And in a year's time? Will David Suzuki still be telling anyone who listens that the goals are hard, and that will we have to start immediately? The longer he goes on in this vein, the more people are going to wonder just how connected to reality David Suzuki is.


Skew my story on Skewz.com
Rate political news for their bias, read related stories, and leave your own skewed commentary


Search for more opinions from Canadian bloggers on these related keywords
 David Suzuki  Kyoto  Canada 


Sphere presents related news articles and blog posts
Sphere It!


Trackbacks
URI: http://haloscan.com/tb/agwnblog/217703

Trackback Submission Form



 

Comments

Come feed the monster... Bernie, in the comments at SDA, has posted a link to the "disappeared" poll that has David Suzuki gnashing his teeth and wetting his bed.

Posted by: neo at March 5, 2007 12:53 AM



If Dr. Fruit Fly feels Kyoto has any merit as a climate change reversal process and if he is aware that meeting the targets for Canada ( which were arbitrarily "doubled" by a grandstanding Chretien at the KP conference)...then he should lead by example....liquidate the assets of his personal and organizational holdings and give this money to offset the billions of dollars in productivity impact Kyoto will sap from the economy ...and off the tables of average Canadians.

FO Dave...you've turned kleptocrat and a prime NIMBY.

You want to have your jobless family freeze in the dark to placate Canada's 2% carbon foot print...yo go right ahead....but if you frig with the average Canadian family's economic security over this hoax, there will be reprocussions.

Posted by: WL Mackenzie Redux at March 6, 2007 09:57 AM



Hello, Hi
Horses For Sale

Posted by: gngbnncnbj at March 17, 2007 01:20 AM



Hello, Hi
Shkespeare

Posted by: rfrxbhbvxv at March 20, 2007 01:13 AM



Hello, Hi
I Need A Sex

Posted by: rfrxbhbvxv at March 20, 2007 04:02 AM



Hello, Hi
Sexy

Posted by: rfrxbhbvxv at March 20, 2007 06:44 AM



Hello, Hi
My Sex Game

Posted by: rfrxbhbvxv at March 20, 2007 09:28 AM