One of the interesting things that came out of the last election in Canada, and since then, is the shift of the ethnic vote away from the Liberals and to the Conservatives. This has happened for a number of reasons. The Jewish community is of course very appreciative of Stephen Harper's unwavering support for Israel. Other ethnic communities, typically socially conservative, feel uncomfortable with same-sex marriage and other socially progressive policies pushed by the Liberals and their friends in certain special interest groups. Of course, no one likes to be taken for granted, and the Liberals have always taken the ethnic vote for granted, and that is itself plenty of reason to take your vote elsewhere.
I bring this up because it would appear that the Liberals are dropping a major initiative aimed at helping minorities. If the Liberal Party no longer perceives minority groups to be pro-Liberal, then I suppose it makes sense to drop them and their interests like a dirty tissue.
Consider these two documents, of which I only have the Table of Contents. I've moved them to my server to prevent them from disappearing.
The first is the Table of Contents for the Policy Workshops for the Liberal Leadership and Biennial Convention. The documentation properties places the date at November 9. Here is the listing of topics for "Canadian Heritage and Identity":
74) Ending Corporate Monopoly of Public Airwaves
75) Canadian Museums
76) Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
77) Protecting the Rights of Minority Communities
78) Linguistic Duality and Official Languages
79) Multiculturalism
80) Restoration of Funding to Status of Women Canada
81) Community Based Women's Organizations
82) Providing Minority Communities with Opportunities
83) Gender Parity
84) Civics - Education
85) Implementation of First Nation Land Claims
86) The Quebec Nation
87) Political Reform
88) Aboriginal Agreements and Strategies
89) "The Kelowna Accord"
90) Liberal Values
91) Amend the Voting Rules within the Liberal Party of Canada
92) Amend the Campaign Finance Rules within the Liberal Party of Canada
93) Proportional Representation
Now on November 20, the document is refined and we have the Policy Workshops to the 2006 Leadership and Biennial Convention. The new subtitle to the document is "Choices that Count". Take a look at the choices that made the cut as counting for something:
74) Ending Corporate Monopoly of Public Airwaves
75) Canadian Museums
76) Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
77) Protecting the rights of minority communities
78) Linguistic Duality and Official Languages
79) Multiculturalism
80) Restoration of Funding to Status of Women Canada
81) Community Based Women's Organizations
82) Gender Parity
83) Civics - Education
84) Implementation of First Nation Land Claims
85) The Quebec Nation
86) Political Reform
87) Aboriginal Agreements and Strategies
88) "The Kelowna Accord"
89) Liberal Values
90) Amend the Voting Rules within the Liberal Party of Canada
91) Amend the Campaign Finance Rules within the Liberal Party of Canada
92) Proportional Representation
One, and only one, disappeared. Apparently "Providing Minority Communities with Opportunities" is a choice that counts for little. And for the Liberals, that is probably true, if the movement of the minority vote continues towards the Conservatives.
To me, this is better than a poll.
By hey, what about "Protecting the rights of minority communities"? Don't be fooled. That has nothing to do with ethnic minorities. I'm willing to bet that this is about the elimination of funding for the Court Challenges Program, a program sold as something to help minorities, but really a tool for social engineering by special interest groups, and missed most by lawyers:
The Canadian Bar Association deplores the federal government's decision to eliminate funding to two legal programs - the Court Challenges Program and the Law Commission of Canada - that make a valuable contribution to Canadian democracy.
"The Court Challenges Program provides a unique counterbalance to the power of the state," says CBA President J. Parker MacCarthy, Q.C. of Duncan, British Columbia. "Canadians have a Charter of Rights, and the Court Challenges Program gives them a voice to exercise their rights under the Charter in the areas of language and equality."
"The CCP gives Canadians a doorway into the legal system. For those who are too vulnerable and disenfranchised to obtain fair treatment from the system on their own, it's often the only access they have," says Parker MacCarthy.
As far as I can see, the only program dedicated to non-native ethnic minorities has disappeared from the Liberal Party policy workshop. It won't even be debated at the convention. The Liberal Party has decided that there is nothing to be gained by offering Liberal "opportunities" to these people.
Nice.
Skew my story on Skewz.com
Rate political news for their bias, read related stories, and leave your own skewed commentary
Search for more opinions from Canadian bloggers on these related keywords
Liberal Party Conservative Party Canada Stephen Harper minorities Biennial Convention Court Challenges Program
Sphere presents related news articles and blog posts
Sphere It!
As you said, Steve, better than a poll.
Posted by: Brian in Calgary at November 21, 2006 09:43 PM
#74 & 76 sound pretty scary to me.
Posted by: John at November 21, 2006 10:02 PM
I agree about #74 & 76. I like "Liberal Values"! Too scary!
Posted by: MikeM at November 21, 2006 11:24 PM
Like so many other programs, the Court Challenges Program really could have been valuable to us if it had been administered properly. Where was the CCP funding for Bruce Montague, for instance?
Posted by: Albert4 at November 22, 2006 09:15 AM
Proportional Representation is the scariest to me.
Even when the Progressive Conservatives were clobbered in 1993 would not have supported such folly.
The idea would lead us to pander to special interest groups as our parliament would fracture into dozens of parties representing any and all single issues. Imagine if you needed the support of members from both the 'Christian Fundamentalist Party' AND the 'Gay and Lesbian Party' to get a bill passed on foreign affairs?
Proportional representation would be a disaster.
Posted by: Gargoyle at November 22, 2006 05:07 PM
So sorry to prick your delight but Resolution 78 replaces 82.
Oh the web of deceit we must weave.
Posted by: hiti at November 24, 2006 01:35 AM
[URL]http://www.stella.donatellv26.org[/URL] [URL]http://www.venezia.u8mbria.org[/URL] [URL]http://www.tempo.u8mbria.org[/URL] [URL]http://www.rossa.em9lia.org[/URL] [URL]http://www.vero.u8mbria.org[/URL] [URL]http://www.sexy.donatellv26.org[/URL] [URL]http://www.musica-gratis.donatellv26.org[/URL] [URL]http://www.unico.donatellv26.org[/URL] [URL]http://www.corriere-della-sera.em9lia.org[/URL] [URL]http://www.rossi.em9lia.org[/URL] [URL]http://www.meteo.em9lia.org[/URL] [URL]http://www.firenze.em9lia.org[/URL] [URL]http://www.piccolo.u8mbria.org[/URL] [URL]http://www.tesoro.donatellv26.org[/URL] [URL]http://www.campania.u8mbria.org[/URL]
Posted by: Trisha at December 16, 2006 11:55 PM
Luogo interessante, buon disegno, lo gradisco, signore! =)
Posted by: firewall at December 19, 2006 11:13 PM
Luogo interessante, buon disegno, lo gradisco, signore! =)
Posted by: firewall at December 19, 2006 11:13 PM