a blog about news and politics by steve janke
 

Spyware sold on store shelves

At the Gizmo Cafe, a story about how major computer and console gaming companies are bundling spyware with their games in order to target ain-game advertising. Actually, the game is the spyware.




From the Gizmo Cafe:

In recent years, industry giant Electronic Arts (EA) has placed an increasing number of advertisements in its gaming environment. Some of the worst culprits include the Need for Speed series, which has lambasted the gamer with fast food billboards, cell phone logos and auto accessory brand names. EA also forces the gamer to listen to its pre-selected songs, or "Trax", which are undoubtedly the tunes being pushed the most by money-waving music industry moguls behind the scenes (the worst case may be NHL 07, which only includes 10-15 songs. That can get awful old after just ten hours of game time).

Currently, EA is facing its greatest backlash over the use of advertising in games. According to some reports, the company's online mass-multiplayer release, Battlefield 2142, is tracking gamer information. By connecting to the internet, gamers are opening their log of personal information to EA, and some have accused the company of using that data to stream specified advertising.

What sort of advertising? From the insert included in Battlefield 2142:

"The software may incorporate technology developed by IGA Worldwide, the advertising technology. The purpose of the advertising technology is to deliver in-game ads when you use the software while connected to the Internet. When you use the software while connected to the Internet, the advertising technology may record your IP address and other anonymous information. That advertising data is temporarily used by IGA to enable the presentation and measurement of in-game ads and other in-game object which are uploaded temporarily to the your PC or game console, and change during online gameplay. The advertising technology does not collect personal or identifiable information about you."

Advertising inbedded in games is nothing new. Advertisers have paid to include product placement in games, but this is a new twist -- dynamically generated advertising based on personal (if anonymous) information.

EA responds by saying they are only targeting regions:

The advertising program in Battlefield 2142 does not access any files which are not directly related to the game. It does not capture personal data such as cookies, account login detail, or surfing history.

BF 2142 delivers ads by region. The advertising system uses a player's IP address to determine the region of the player, assisting to serve the appropriate ads by region and language. For instance, a player in Paris might be presented with ads in French. The information collected will not berepurposed for other uses.

Battlefield 2142 also tracks "impression data" related to in-game advertisements: location of a billboard in the game, brand advertised, duration of advertisement impression, etc. This information is used to help advertisers qualify the reach of a given advertisement.

Whatever EA says is essentially irrelevant, since tomorrow it or some other company will be downloading cookies and surfing history. Indeed, that might already be happening.

The guys at Gizmo Cafe have a good response:

For a gamer who abhors legislation, it's tough for me to admit that there needs to be some sort of regulation on this. If companies like EA - the game publishers who certainly don't need the extra money - want to pound our eyeballs with advertisements, then perhaps we could see a drop in the price of affected games. Knock ten, even fifteen dollars off of the title.

We made you rich, EA. We deserve it.

I'd agree, but I'd go one step further. EA should offer two versions -- one with and one without dynamic advertising. Make the price differential explicit, transparent, and significant. Let the consumer choose which to purchase. I think EA would be pleasantly surprised by the number of people happy to pay less for a game and allow the dynamic advertising.

A move like that would do much to inoculate EA against the anger that is coming its way, especially when the next big EA comes out with far more intrusive snooping designed to please voracious advertisers.


Skew my story on Skewz.com
Rate political news for their bias, read related stories, and leave your own skewed commentary


Search for more opinions from Canadian bloggers on these related keywords
 Electronic Arts  EA  NHL 07  Battlefield 2142  spyware  Gizmo Cafe 


Sphere presents related news articles and blog posts
Sphere It!


Trackbacks
URI: http://haloscan.com/tb/agwnblog/203067

Trackback Submission Form



 

Comments

I would suggest that rampant "piracy" is a key factor behind inserting advertising and spyware into games. Much freeware/shareware follows this business model. You have to monetize your work somehow.

However, it must be particularly galling to have actually paid for a game and still be subjected to such advertising. This is not unlike going to the cinema only to be forced to watch 20 minutes of ads. You might as well download the game from a P2P site. That's what many movie viewers now do.

Posted by: Steve at October 30, 2006 08:17 PM



Steve, Your point about piracy is well taken with respect to other games, but the Battlefield series is virtually immune to piracy. Every time you load up the game your copy of the game and its CD key is verified at EA servers. If it's not valid you can't play online.

Needless to say, a huge debate raged on the EA forums on this issue. But I think the real kick in the pants is that there is no warning about the spyware on the OUTSIDE of the game box. Clearly a marketing ploy by EA to prevent buyers from second-guessing their purchase.

So you open the box, discover the spyware notice on the INSIDE, then realize you can't return the game to the store since it has been opened.

I like the Battlefield series but I am not buying BF 2142 because of this very issue.

Posted by: Rob at October 31, 2006 02:33 PM



It's a touchy issue and as a philisophically conservative it's tough for me to suggest 'there oughta be a law..." but I do think there oughta simply be more class on the part of major games manufacturers. EA isn't just some little cog in the week, they're one of the biggest if not the single biggest game maker out there.

Posted by: wayde at November 3, 2006 01:13 PM