a blog about news and politics by steve janke
 

Cindy Sheehan: Proven irrelevant?

OK, I'm going to do something here that some people won't like.

I'm going to give Cindy Sheehan a huge boost.

How?

By linking to her blog.

Why should it matter? From her Sitemeter:

Total: 332
Average Per Day: 5
Average Visit Length: 1:13
Last Hour: 0
Today: 20
This Week: 34

Five a day? Has she become so irrelevant that you can count the number of people who come to read her writings using the fingers on one hand?

Over the last 30 days, her peak traffic was 44 hits on the June 18. At the time I write this, her day's traffic is 20. I suppose that will change given my Saturday and Sunday traffic runs at over a thousand each day.

Where is her traffic coming from? Mostly Google hits. Besides Google, the most recent hits are coming from this article at AlterNet, a left-wing online independent media outlet.

Her website was created by Theron Parlin, a part-time web designer, so I would doubt this is technical problem.

I just expected something else. A couple of thousand hits a day from adoring fans at Code Pink and elsewhere. But a couple of dozen?

Maybe this is an example of the difference between the media and the people they serve. Cindy Sheehan still makes it in the papers and on TV with her fasts and her foreign trips to visit the likes of Hugo Chavez. But in the blogosphere, where you choose what news you want to read, people are going elsewhere.

Interesting.

Update: Some people have wondered if the blog is, in fact, a parody, or otherwise not legitimate. That might be the case. However, the registration information looked right (including an address in Berkeley where Cindy Sheehan now resides). The email address provided checked out with a comment left on Tim Blair's blog that also seemed right. The link from AlterNet certainly adds credibility. I've scratched my head on why the blog of such an anti-war celebrity seems to be so dead, and I've considered that maybe this isn't her blog at all. But I can't find any reason not to think it is her blog, and several reasons to think it is. If it is a parody, I don't get the joke. But then an unfunny parody is not likely to get a lot of traffic, now is it.

If anyone can confirm this one way or the other, let me know.

Here is something interesting to consider. I just went through every subpage of Michael Moore's recommended links (Alternative Media, Community, etc), and I found no mention of Cindy Sheehan on any page under any category. Daily Kos does not have her on the Blogroll. In fact, Google can't find any pages that link to her blog (too soon for my link to show).

Regrets: I have to say that I am starting to regret highlighting Cindy Sheehan's blog (if indeed it is hers, or run by someone close to her). People have been visiting the blog and leaving some very crude and vicious comments. Obviously I'm not responsible for what someone else does with their online time, but to know that they used my link in order to spew their bile makes me hope that most of my readers are made of better stuff than that. If you are one of those posters and you are reading this, please consider other blogs and websites than mine where you might be welcome. You aren't welcome here.





Skew my story on Skewz.com
Rate political news for their bias, read related stories, and leave your own skewed commentary


Search for more opinions from Canadian bloggers on these related keywords


Sphere presents related news articles and blog posts
Sphere It!


Trackbacks
URI: http://haloscan.com/tb/agwnblog/186330

Trackback Submission Form



 

Comments

Maybe its kos the site’s doing a sympathy fast while Cindy balloons out of control, sort of like the portrait of Dorian Gray in reverse.

Posted by: Bernie at July 15, 2006 08:51 PM



Who's Cindy Sheehan?

Posted by: TrustOnlyMulder at July 15, 2006 09:21 PM



I have as much contempt for this woman and her wretched seditious politics as I have admiration and gratitude to her late son, who gave his life in the cause of human liberty.

The mother has her freedom to spout her venom because of the sacrifice of far better human beings, including her own son.

Posted by: Dave at July 15, 2006 09:51 PM



I read a couple of postings on her blog and I am confused!!!?

Is this woman on a hunger strike or not? Since when does a smoothie with a protein boost (coffee with ice cream) figure into the equation.

Although I consider the tactics of the IRA reprehensible and indefensible, I can respect the members who went on hunger strikes (and died of starvation) while in British prisons. They DIED for their convictions. Exactly what is she willing to do for hers (spend some time being uncomfortably hungry as her stomach shrinks)?

It appears to me that Sheehan has simply found a way to politicize her own personal weight loss plan.

This woman has reached new lows and has simply proven herself to be irrelevant.

Posted by: vieux loup at July 15, 2006 10:42 PM



Any time you want to prove me irrelevant by linking to my blog, you go right ahead. Of course, I get four or five times as many hits on my blog as she does on hers, so I guess that makes me 4 or 5 times less irrelevant than her...

Posted by: Ed Minchau at July 16, 2006 12:32 AM



Ed, you beat me to it, although you can find me here if you look hard enough. But seriously, folks, how many people knew she even had a blog? I didn't, until now. Thanks for the link, Steve.

Posted by: Dr.Dawg at July 16, 2006 07:43 AM



If this is in fact her site (and it's somewhat hard to believe that the political left wouldn't be plugging it a little harder) then that level of traffic is actually quite an insult. You would expect that she should be able to generate a lot of hate comments from pro-war types, if not support from fellow anti-bush types.

Baffling

Posted by: Cynapse at July 16, 2006 02:47 PM



The lefties don't want to publicize her blog because Fenton Communications won't assign it a 24/7 monitor to launder her daft babbling the way they can with public and media appearances...

Posted by: richard mcenroe at July 16, 2006 02:59 PM



I posted a challenging, yet very polite, comment on her site and it was erased within a 1/2 hour...

Posted by: Richard Evans at July 16, 2006 03:47 PM



oopsie... strike that... it's still there... just not showing up on the comments counter...

Posted by: Richard Evans at July 16, 2006 03:50 PM



Check of the referals to here site now. Steve, you're slammming her site. Remove your link to her until they can set up a mirror!

Actually never mind. Any kind of mirror that points to that hideous wench is going to break anyway.

Posted by: at July 16, 2006 06:16 PM



Can you believe the photo she has up there? Is that the "sheehan brand"?

Posted by: david maclean at July 16, 2006 06:35 PM



HAHAHAHA!

Posted by: peekyou at July 16, 2006 08:56 PM



I want my click back. What a waste of bandwidth.

Posted by: Mac at July 16, 2006 11:25 PM