From my post on November 18:
As you recall, Liberal MP David Smith, who sits in Parliament for the riding of Pontiac and claims to be an aboriginal, ran a company called Abotech, a computer consultancy firm, out of his home. Now the company is run by his wife, a nurse. Smith insists he has no idea what is going in Abotech.
Abotech has been caught up in a KPMG audit at PWGSC. Several contracts between Abotech and the federal government have been terminated. Why? No one is saying. Also, a bureaucrat named Frank Brazeau has been suspended without pay in connection with the audit. Frank Brazeau is also David Smith's cousin. Why was he suspended? No one is saying.
The reports we have from the media state the problem has to do with sole-sourcing contracts. In other words, this is a problem of process, not of quality of work. Abotech itself is innocent, or so it is implied. In fact, it is the victim in this drama. It is being punished because it accepted contracts from an incompetent or corrupt government official, a certain Frank Brazeau, who did not follow the rules.
Is the sole-sourcing problem for which Abotech is being punished, and that was so breezily dismissed by Minister Brison as really an opportunity to improve on the quality work provided by Abotech, just a smokescreen? Is it a way to deal with a potentially embarrassing problem in a quiet way, especially with a minority government in the balance? Is Frank Brazeau guilty of being a convenient scapegoat? Does he even know what is really going on, or has he been simultaneously promised a reward for his silence and threatened with retribution if he talks?
Is this about protecting David Smith and one extra Liberal seat so crucial for the survival of the minority government? Is this about trying to avoid one more multi-million dollar scandal, a scandal that might prove fatal to the scandal-ridden Liberal Party if it becomes public just prior to an election? Is my theory about aboriginal set-asides being diverted by Frank Brazeau to David Smith just plain wrong, or at best, a side show?
Apparently, my nagging suspicions were right on the money.
From the Montreal Gazette, by Peter O'Neil of the Vancouver Sun:
The Paul Martin government, bracing last fall for Justice John Gomery's scathing sponsorship scandal report and a possible snap election, played down opposition questions suggesting the emergence of another potentially explosive federal ethics controversy.
The questions related to media coverage of an obscure government employee named Frank Brazeau, suspended after contracting irregularities were uncovered by auditors for KPMG - an international accounting company - including contracts improperly let to the family company of Quebec Liberal MP David Smith.
The documents, and subsequent interviews, show the issues linked to Brazeau triggered two police investigations since 2004, $655,000 worth of forensic reviews by KPMG Canada, and a number of disciplinary actions against federal bureaucrats -including three firings.
Three firings? Should I hazard a guess and say at least one of those firings was Bill McCann? Was another Louis Vadeboncoeur?
But what of Brazeau?
The first two KPMG reviews looked at 89 Brazeau-managed contracts valued at $15 million from March 2001 to March 31, 2005.
KPMG uncovered "systemic" and "egregious" rule-breaking as well as a "conflict of interest" at Brazeau's unit at CAC, the documents show.
There was "evidence of manipulation of procurement process, including apparent manipulation of evaluations," as well as "evidence that in three cases contractors were directed to submit false or misleading invoices," according to one summary of the KPMG reports looking into contracts managed by Brazeau, a "principal consultant" at CAC.
KPMG concluded there was a "referral process to (a) specific contractor." It also cited an individual or firm "used as a conduit for contracting with retired public servants." The conduit's identity was whited out because of Privacy Act considerations.
White out -- that's nice. Wouldn't it be a shock to find out that the conduit was Abotech run by Frank Brazeau's cousin David Smith, who was a high-ranking public servant with Public Works for many years? A guy who probably knew a lot of retired public servants like himself?
Now remember how the Ethics Commissioner decided that David Smith had never acted unethically? Moreover, that during his "investigation", the Ethics Commissioner did not uncover the fact that David Smith and Frank Brazeau were cousins?
I knew they were cousins. I reported it on this blog. I also sent an email to the Ethics Commissioner after the investigation was announced, though apparently that was ignored.
But apparently, this was not news. If the Ethics Commissioner had accessed the KPMG investigation into Abotech as part of his investigation, he would have known this:
Among the contracts looked at by KPMG were 15 - valued at a total of $1 million - that went to the family company of Liberal MP Smith.
Public Works wasn't aware until the KPMG probes that Brazeau and Smith are cousins who grew up together in the same small Outaouais town of Maniwaki, and that Brazeau was secretary of Smith's Liberal riding association from December 2004 to August 2005, according to department spokesperson Pierre Teotonio. [emphasis added]
Interesting stuff. First, it would suggest that Frank Brazeau was seriously cooking the books, and that his cousin's company profited from that quite handsomely. Maybe David Smith did not act unethically, but it is unconscionable that the Ethics Commissioner did not figure out the close family relationship between these two men as part of his investigation into the David Smith's ethical behaviour.
Actually it was a case of willful blindness:
Finally, the Ethics Commissioner cannot render findings in relation to the issuance of the sole-source contracts by Consulting and Audit Canada and Abotech Inc. since these events all occurred prior to the Member from Pontiac being elected to the House of Commons and before the Code came into force on October 4, 2004. The Conflict of Interest Code for Members of the House of Commons does not have a retroactive affect.
But the fact that they are cousins was true after David Smith became an MP. Obviously, this aspect of the law is too subtle for me to understand.
But back to the big picture. Public Works Minister Scott Brison lied on the floor of the House of Commons, or just came up short of lying by a hair's breadth:
Former Liberal Public Works minister Scott Brison insisted the internal KPMG probe was "not an audit" but, in fact, part of an "ongoing ... review" to improve accountability and competition in government operations.
"It is important to note that ... value was received for tax dollars," Brison assured B.C. MP James Moore in October, adding Brazeau had been disciplined.
But a series of documents, requested by the Vancouver Sun on Oct. 3 and provided a week after the January federal election, paint a far more dramatic picture about how seriously Ottawa was taking the emerging scandal.
"Prompt action is critical - Gomery findings due Nov. 1," declared a Sept. 27, 2005, internal document that urged measures to "pre-empt" negative fallout.
[That] document suggested CAC's dismantling should be a key component of a "communications strategy" to deal with fallout from the KPMG results.
But the Liberals played down the move, burying it in an Oct. 21 news release unveiling a new policy on government auditing. It said only that Ottawa was "realigning the functions" of CAC by having Public Works take over the function of hiring outside consultants.
"Realigning" a hotbed of borderline criminal activity that included one of the Liberal Party's own MP's? Just how many more examples of outright theft and graft have been successfully swept under the carpet over the last twelve years?
I'd like to think I helped keep this one example out in the open, at least long enough for the media to get some traction on it. Media types like Peter O'Neil, who obviously did not think this story was to be forgotten. Peter and I spoke on the phone on the preparation of his story. I helped Peter with the background, and with navigating the long list of Abotech posts on this blog, helping him identify the key pieces.
Peter has written to me: "Steve, your site was incredibly useful in helping me get a full picture of this emerging and very complex story, and helped fill in many of the holes in the documents I got through ATIP. I probably never would have discovered, for instance, that Brazeau and Smith are cousins."
I think it is important to highlight that Peter has been working on this story for many months, actually slightly longer than me.
And one more comment from Peter that certain readers should take note: "I think you are a formidable and dogged researcher and, as I've said to you privately, I think you should be able to find work at one of the research offices on Parliament Hill." Interested parties can email me. I am available to start immediately.
I think Peter did a bang-up job, and his revelations concerning the way the Liberal government was deliberately down-playing the story makes me wonder if the new government has assigned enough people to cleaning up the messes the Liberals have left behind.
Skew my story on Skewz.com
Rate political news for their bias, read related stories, and leave your own skewed commentary
Search for more opinions from Canadian bloggers on these related keywords
Sphere presents related news articles and blog posts
Sphere It!
http://www.voy.com/178771/1706.html
How the Liberals ducked another scandal
* * * * The Gazette
Published: Sunday, March 05, 2006
As the Martin government braced for the Gomery report on the sponsorship scandal last fall, it also was worried about another potentially explosive controversy.
That situation involved contracts let improperly to a family company of Quebec Liberal MP David Smith and other "egregious" contracting irregularities by a federal agency called Consulting and Audit Canada, discovered by outside auditors.
Documents released since the January election show how seriously Ottawa was taking the emerging scandal.
Consulting and Audit Canada was dismantled. There were two police investigations, more forensic audits, and firings of three bureaucrats. Smith was exonerated of any conflict of interest by the House of Commons ethics commissioner.
The full picture is described in a report on Page A6
Posted by: maz2 at March 5, 2006 08:24 PM
Once again, you guys are out to lunch. You forgot to follow the Elisabeth Nadeau trail. Where is she now? She was at the head of Consulting and Audit Canada, married to a Liberal Senator, Pierre de Bane. She is the one that PWGSC is protecting, a friend of the DM Marshall. Brazeau did not have signing authority, he is the scapegoat. I'll give you another hint, the following was done by the International section at CAC where Brazeau was never involved in but what did Nadeau do about it?
Absolutely nothing.
http://www.acdi-cida.gc.ca/AuditCIDAandCAC
Posted by: Socialist at March 5, 2006 09:01 PM
Attaboy Steve!
The world is changing because now regular people can keep the truth from being buried. It's not harder to be a politician or a bureaucrat these days, just harder to be a crooked one.
It was reading posts like yours that got me interested in blogs and blogging in the first place. Keep setting the pace.
Posted by: Halfwise halfwit at March 5, 2006 09:15 PM
Scott Brison, lie?
Quelle Surprise.
Posted by: Toronto Tory at March 5, 2006 09:21 PM
I wonder if, now that Shapiro has found religion and decided that the election of members has fallen into his purview, he will investigate Brison's statements in the house? After all, what is lying to the members of parliament and the Canadian people on the floor if not a breach of ethics?
I know that this is a pipe dream but we can always wish. I only hope that real investigations will get underway as soon as possible and prosecutions will commence soon after (including an investigation into Shapiro himself; the bias he demonstrates in the performance of his duties is far too obvious).
Gerry
Posted by: gerryinmontreal at March 5, 2006 10:02 PM
With the head of the RCMP, the Ethics Commissioner, etc etc appointed by the past Liberal PM, it will be difficult for a new government to bring such matters to justice.
Posted by: brock at March 5, 2006 11:24 PM
Actually, the RCMP Commish was appointed by Chretien... which is even worse!!
Posted by: Mac at March 6, 2006 12:16 AM
Yesterday I was watching Pierre Donais's program on CPAC. A caller mentioned this Smith situation and both Donais and Boudria acted as if they had never heard of this--shrugging shoulders and rolling eyes at the caller.
Posted by: George at March 6, 2006 07:20 AM
Consulting & Audit Canada
Matching Documents: 1
Search for: (david,smith)
46% Registration - User Name Already In Use
Last Updated: 2006-03-06
http://www.cac.gc.ca/corp/internet/cacinternet.nsf/sResults_En?SearchView&Query=(david,smith)&sType=Any&SearchWV=True&sTool=s
Posted by: maz2 at March 6, 2006 09:17 AM
Only Brazeau was fired over this. McCann is now back from "sick leave" and is working part time at the Labour Dept. Vadeboncoeur is Nadeau's protege and has been protected.
The real crime here is that the reporters have not done their homework. Has anyone actually spoken to Brazeau about all this? Why is it that he can be fired over "administrative" problems that everyone else at CAC was following? Why is it that he was fired when he never signed any of those contracts? I really wish you guys would stop regurgitating the same old nonsense and actually do your work from first principles.
I have pointed you all in the right direction in the past, but you still don't want to go there. Why aren't you putting the heat on Marshall? He's the one that ignored an internal review of this process -- the one that recommended that Brazeau be reinstated because he had done nothing underhanded at all -- and decided to protect his liberal friend Nadeau in spite of all the evidence against her. You guys missed that one, didn't you.
Posted by: at March 6, 2006 09:22 AM
The problem is that "all the evidence" points at Brazeau. No one can find Brazeau. The KPMG audit nailed Brazeau, though I don't think anyone has seen the full unedited report.
Bottom line is that we need someone from the inside willing to go on the record and make clear and preferably verifiable allegations. No one has, and all the information we can dig up goes in the same direction.
Posted by: Steve Janke at March 6, 2006 09:42 AM
I'd say another judicial enquiry is needed by someone who isn't afraid to roll over all the rocks and see what's hiding under 'em.
Posted by: Mac at March 6, 2006 01:11 PM
When PMSH replaces Shapiro as Ethics Commish, I hope they roll out allllllllllllll these obvious omissions that Shapiro has a hand in, just to show the public that PMSH isn't covering his arse in the Emerson thing, but ridding us of a VERY biased liberal wolf-in-sheeps-clothing. Good onya Steve! Keep 'er rolling! Perhaps your next project will be about "criminal immigrants" that Vic Malarek (W-5) is working on? Just a thought ;)
Posted by: Snookie at March 7, 2006 07:01 AM
Steve Janke for Ethics Commissioner!
Boot Shapiro into prison!
Posted by: richfisher at March 7, 2006 10:45 AM
Janke with all the lies you printed with regards to Smith, you may be facing a lawsuit.
Posted by: at March 7, 2006 12:26 PM