From the Conservative Party website:
“The Finance Minister has no choice but to tender his resignation,” said Conservative Finance Critic Monte Solberg. “This investigation confirms that there are reasonable grounds to suspect criminal wrongdoing in his department or office, and as minister he must accept responsibly. That’s how our system works.”
Solberg pointed out that the Conservative Party has consistently raised serious concerns about suspicious trading patterns of certain income trusts in the hours preceding his November 23rd policy announcement.
“Why has Mr. Goodale refused to take seriously the compelling evidence of a government leak that ended up benefiting privileged insiders?” Mr. Solberg asked. “Now basic principles of public ethics and ministerial responsibility require that he do the honourable thing and resign.”
Now read it again, with a few substitutions and additions here or there:
“The
Finance MinisterPrime Minister has no choice but to tender his resignation,” saidConservative Finance Critic Monte Solberganyone with a brain. “This investigation confirms that there are reasonable grounds to suspect criminal wrongdoing in his department or office, and as minister in charge of Quebec under Jean Chretien as well as finance minister he must accept responsibly for exercising no oversight over $350 million in public funds. That’s how our system works.”
SolbergAny person with even a shred of intelligence pointed out that the Conservative Party has consistently raised serious concerns aboutsuspicious trading patterns of certain income trusts in the hours preceding his November 23rd policy announcementthe allocation of contracts to advertising firms in Quebec and about the official response to the conclusions of the Gomery Inquiry.“Why has
Mr. GoodaleMr. Martin refused to take seriously thecompelling evidence of aconclusion of an inquiry confirming governmentleakmanipulation of contracts that ended up benefiting privilegedinsidersQuebec advertising firms, and ultimately the Liberal Party itself?”Mr. Solbergevery person giving this story only a few miniutes consideration asked. “Now basic principles of public ethics and ministerial responsibility require that he do the honourable thing and resign.”
Really, I'm not sure what the difference is. Ain't going to happen, of course.
Skew my story on Skewz.com
Rate political news for their bias, read related stories, and leave your own skewed commentary
Search for more opinions from Canadian bloggers on these related keywords
Sphere presents related news articles and blog posts
Sphere It!
the original version and the edited version are twins.
Posted by: at December 29, 2005 11:25 AM
What I want to know is why no one has raised the question of how convenient it was for Martin as the Finance minister to list the steam ships as being in the one country exempt to taxation when he wrote up the law... wasn't that a slight conflict of interest??? Shouldn't he be under just as much suspision as poor old Raulphy boy??? and finally, Could Paul be as certain as he is about the whole Raulphy being innocent because he's the one that leaked it???
Posted by: MrEd at December 29, 2005 03:26 PM