a blog about news and politics by steve janke
 

The Income Trust Scandal: An easy prediction

Remember what I said about Ralph Goodale keeping his job? That it wasn't really up to him?

Even as we speak, Liberal Blackberries are alight. Many, I am certain, are carrying messages considering the consequences of cutting Ralph Goodale loose.

Cutting him from his privileges and responsibilites as Minister of Finance.

Maybe even cutting him out of the party altogether. Long odds for that one, I think.

But Ralph Goodale's future is not going to be determined by the RCMP, the OSC, or even by Ralph Goodale. It will be determined by Scott Reid, John Duffy, Cyrus Reporter, and others in the Liberal war room. These unelected lobbyists advising Paul Martin are interested in only one thing -- how to get the Liberals back in power and thus preserve their conduits to government influence and cash. If Ralph Goodale's troubles get in the way, he'll be out.

Bourque is carrying news that Goodale is likely to get the boot:

Bourque has learned that embattled Finance Minister Ralph Goodale is being pressured to give up his Cabinet seat for an indeterminate period of time, this in light of devastating news first revealed to the nation here yesterday that the RCMP has launched a criminal investigation into leaks from his department regarding rulings relating to the growing income trust scandal. According to senior sources inside the Paul Martin Liberal Party who spoke on condition of anonymity, "the official party posture is that Ralph didn't know anything and therefore shouldn't have to resign, but the public perception is devastating, it's killing us, and we need to move firmly to squelch the stink." Incredibly, Prime Minister Paul Martin has refused to comment publicly on news of the RCMP criminal probe, though it is understood that he has had a few choice words with key staff about this file.

Any guesses about what those choice words were?

Here are some ideas:

  • "Do what needs to be done!"
  • "All I'm saying is that we don't need this right now. That's all I'm saying."
  • "Let me be perfectly clear..." [followed by an extended silence]
  • "Boy, am I lucky they never caught on to any of my leaks when I was in charge of finance!"
  • "Scott, what do I think? What should my opinion be on this? Where's the latest poll?!"
  • "Will someone go tell Ralph to stop knocking on the door? Tell him we'll call him in when we're ready to tell him what his decision is going to be. Now read that part back about 'After careful consideration of my role as finance minister...' "
  • "What a miserable and weary day. It would do well for a smile to cross my royal visage. Call the court jester! Call Feschuk!"
  • "Ralph #%&@ Goodale! "




Skew my story on Skewz.com
Rate political news for their bias, read related stories, and leave your own skewed commentary


Search for more opinions from Canadian bloggers on these related keywords


Sphere presents related news articles and blog posts
Sphere It!


Trackbacks
URI: http://haloscan.com/tb/agwnblog/147343

Trackback Submission Form



 

Comments

Interesting to read the U.S. take on this story at: http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/cat_canada.php

Posted by: ann at December 29, 2005 10:39 AM



Ralph Goodale interview on CTV is interesting on two levels (It can be viewed on their website).

First, we can now understand the unusual release of the RCMP statement which emphasized there was no evidence of wrongdoing on the part of anyone "associated with the investigation". The release was parsed to the point of irrelevance because it was based on talking points that Ralph is now using over and over again to imply the RCMP isn't even thinking he might have done something wrong.

Second, we now have from Goodale's own lips a clear statement that the number of people who can be suspects are limited to himself, the very small group he told in his own office, the Prime Minister, and those he told. He confirmed the Prime Minister was notified during the day. Given the late breaking pop on this, that's significant.

Goodale is also trying to lay the groundwork for the "informed guess" theory, suggesting his statement in the scrum that he wanted to put an end to uncertainty may have prompted the unusual activity, but the interviewer quickly disposed of that canard. As she pointed out, that didn't tell anyone what the decision would be. Besides, why would he have said anything ahead of time, if he now believes such a statement could have the effect of moving markets. Did he not believe that before? Either way, he's just giving more reasons why he should step down.

Posted by: Patrick at December 29, 2005 10:51 AM



It aint Ralph....
Ralph is just a rube and a boob....but somebody in finance told somebody else and so on!

Besides being bad PR for the LIberals this won't amount to anything because there were no laws broken.
Its not illegal to leak policy and the OSC won't be able to ( or just won't ) prosecute anyone.

However...I still say three cheers for all the bloggers out there who kept this story alive in the face of the smothering silence in the MSM.

Posted by: PGP at December 29, 2005 11:08 AM



Re. the choice words: hilarious.

I got a belly laugh out of that one. That is prime humour.

Posted by: Ade at December 29, 2005 11:09 AM



I bet PM made more bucks on it that me.

Posted by: george at December 29, 2005 11:19 AM



It was reported that Goodale's office met with investment dealers BEFORE the announcement...

The question that MUST be asked...

Of all the companies that made money on that day in November...

HOW MANY OF THOSE HAD CLOSE TIES TO THE LIBERAL PARTY?

M.H.
( retired banker )

Posted by: Merv Hollingsworth at December 29, 2005 11:38 AM