Angry in the Great White North
The Income Trust Scandal: Denials, challenges, admissions, and insults
Friday, December 09, 2005 at 08:21 AM

Read other posts by Steve Janke published by the National Post

Leader

CTV is now reporting a bizarre series of denials and grudging admissions surrounding the CTV story in which a senior director at an investment company a seniors' advocacy group claims that he was tipped by a senior member from Finance Minister Ralph Goodale's office of the forthcoming announcement not to tax income trusts, but to reduce the taxation on stocks paying dividends.

The suspicion is that he flurry of market activity represented key investors using this inside information to position themselves to profit after the announcement was made.

Denials. Challenges. Grudging admissions. And even an insult! Do you get a feeling that a sense of panic setting in with some people connected with this story.



Main Story

From CTV:

"The day they made the announcement they phoned us and said something is going to be said," [Bill Gleberzon, the Director of Government & Media Relations for Canada's Association for the Fifty Plus (CARP)], told CTV News Wednesday night.

Gleberzon said the call came from a senior policy advisor in the finance minister's office, someone his group had been dealing with all along.

However, on Thursday morning, Gleberzon and CARP issued a news release denying any advance knowledge of Goodale's announcement.

"At no time was CARP given an indication by the Minister's office of when the announcement would be made or what it would say," the release said.

But then what did he tell CTV?

CTV's Kathy Tomlinson talked to Gleberzon after the release was issued. He confirmed what he had said in the previous interview, but now maintained he had misspoken.

So he misspoke when he said he got a phone call? How do you get a basic fact like that confused?

At first, Gleberzon said no one from the finance minister's office had contacted him about the interview.

When told that the finance ministry's communications director, John Embury, had already admitted to calling Gleberzon Wednesday night, he explained:

"I did speak to him …. I shouldn't have said that I didn't, but I did," Gleberzon told Tomlinson.

So he's lying? Was he lying then? Is he lying now?

But it gets better. Embury was then trying to coach Gleberzon, while at the same time undercutting his credibility with the media by alleging some sort of age-related dementia:

"They phoned me and they asked -- they found out about the interview. He asked me what was going on, I told him, but it's when we were talking about the timing issue that I realized how important it was," [Gleberzon said.]

Gleberzon said Embury told him: "We don't want to coach you, we don't want to tell you what to say, we just want to know what to prepare for."

Embury was aware of the story earlier in the day, and sent an email to CTV Wednesday night, before the newscast aired, saying of Gleberzon: "He denies saying what he is supposed to have said to your reporter."

In a phone call later, Embury told CTV's Robert Fife that Gleberzon was old and confused.

We don't want to coach you, but we want you to be prepared.

Um, isn't coaching defined as preparing a person for some sort of contest?

And calling Gleberzon old and confused? That's cute. Apparently, Embury has apologized.

Maybe Warren Kinsella can help sort this out.

Search for more opinions from Canadian bloggers on these related keywords